May 31, 2010

Coming around again...

...after committing one of the most terrible sins in blogging: not posting in ages (well, it was like a week and a half). Let me start by telling you that —just like Regina Lampert said—I'm not a lady of leisure anymore. I got that good journalism internship offer that I told you about, so I'll be very busy from 9.30 am to 19 pm starting tomorrow and ending in September.
So this is gonna be the last long post that you read in my blog in months (I've planned to answer a survey that will provide me an easy to make post per day for a month). And this last long post it's gonna be very random, since I'm gonna try to cover all the things I didn't wrote about last week. So fasten your seat belts, it's gonna be a bumpy post.
Finished "The secret lives of a princess" by James Spada and I tell you, I wouldn't trade my life for Grace's. I mean, she had an awful family, her father was obsessed with success but never said something nice about her little girl, even when she won an Oscar; her sisters were abusive when she was a kid, and her mother sold stories about Grace to the press! Had lots of famous lovers but couldn't settle down with any of them, mainly because of her family opposition. Loved to act, was great at it, but her studio (when it didn't lend her to others) just gave her stupid parts. Then she marries the Prince —who had a list of possible Hollywood actresses to wed just to improve Monaco image— in a ceremony paid by MGM. She has to suffer all the archaic customs of the palace, but she was prohibited to make another movie, even when Hitch offered a role in "Marnie". The only escape she found was raising her kids the better she could, but the girls turn out to be rebels and had dissipated lives. AND then she died in a car accident. So, no thanks, poor Grace.
This knowledge increased my inner debate about whether is good or not to classic film fans to investigate the private lives of performers and directors. I mean, sometimes you really loved someone's work, but then you read something bad about their behavior, something sad about their lives, or you realize that they beliefs are very very different to your own, and then what was more important —the films— are kind of overshadow to your eyes by this knowledge. Anyway, it doesn't happen to me frequently, one of my cases is Norma Shearer (I've been avoiding watching more of her movies) because I read somewhere that she got the parts mostly because she was married to Irving Thalberg.  And of course, it does happen the other way around, for example, I appreciate the work of Myrna Loy even more since I learned about her fight for human rights. 
Anyway, been reading "People will talk" by John Kobal, and I want to read more of his work. It's like any of us, classic movie lovers, have had the opportunity to sit down and chat with the stars. Loved his interviews with Gloria Swanson, Ingrid Bergman, Mae West and other famous actresses and professionals related to movies. Loved the way he describes the way the stars treated him (like Marlene Dietrich putting him up in her hotel room, since he had traveled a long distance and didn't have a place to stay). Or the way the stars of silent films described their work, so vividly...If you find this book, buy it, I'm loving it.
Well I saw a lot of movies in May, I talk about the most of them in previous mini-reviews. But the last two weeks a saw three great films:

a) I remember mama: Irene Dunne was a great actress. When you see her in this film, you forget who she is, you forget the other roles she played, because she really is the Norwegian immigrant mother. There are some scenes that break your heart, especially when she goes to visit her little girl at the hospital.

b) Witness for the prosecution: I love Billy Wilder, I just had forgotten how much I loved him. My Film Review teacher always said that we should avoid treating the subjects as masters, but he was one. Laughton was terrific, Marlene was terrific, Tyrone Power was great, and Agatha Christie did it again.

c) Three Comrades: Maybe the movie written by Francis Scott Fitzgerald is the weakest of the three, but I liked it very much. Saw it last night and I couldn't sleep well. Saw the scenes over and over in my mind. Robert Taylor is #7 in my top 25 favorite classic actors (someday I'm gonna update and translate that post), and I don't care if his characters are pretty much the same in every movie I've seen him in, I always enjoy his presence on screen. I just had seen Margaret Sullavan in the "Shop around the corner" but her performance is really heartbreaking, her character seem so defenseless, but at the same time strong minded and generous. 

Well, I can't write more, because we're too many in this house using one computer, but let me finish this post with this picture I captured from "Stardust, the Bette Davis story" I saw today. Don't you think that the classic stars can look even more modern than modern actors? I want to see this picture in the next Everlast campaign :) 


Well, see ya tomorrow with the first post of this meme.

May 21, 2010

More Happy Old Songs

Since yesterday was such a good day, and I promised to make a new post with happy oldies, well, here there are the next three:

"La Dolce Vita" (finale) by Nino Rota.
If I learned something watching How to lose friends and alienate people, it was the fact that La Dolce Vita theme can make you smile (I mean, Fellini's film was depressing).

I uploaded the clip in Flickr, 'cause it will be probably deleted from Youtube. 

"Pass me by" cover by Peggy Lee
The song was originally composed for Father Goose, but I love Peggy's version. Its rhythm really cheers you up.


"Thoroughly modern Millie" by Julie Andrews.
This is the best thing from the movie with the same name (it had its moments, but it wasn't very good overall). It's joyful,  it's about the Roaring Twenties, and Julie's rendition is great.


Hope you enjoyed!

Previous Happy Old Songs Posts: 1 |

May 20, 2010

What a good day!


Me today: happy as Shirley Temple

Yesterday I started a whiny post complaining about the lack of good journalism internship offers and the fact that I missed a workshop on Classic directors that was given in a movie theater. I decided to go to play tennis and forgot to publish it.
And today was a great day.
It started with me going to the capital (Santiago) to check the "sacred folder of internships for journalism students" at university. I found a new one! And it's very good, so I already sent my CV to the guy in charge. If they accept me, I'm gonna be on time to enter to the next film appreciation workshop, "Movie Genres". Yay.
Then I had to buy a brand new video game to my youngest brother, "Read Dead Redemption". It was sold out everywhere. I was visiting store after store, and I passed next to a used book store (as I told you, I'm crazy about them). So I took a break and entered. Went to the Biography section, and found books about Katharine Hepburn and... Zelda Fitzgerald! I think her life with Francis was so interesting and dramatic, but until today I just had found one book about them (the lovely Dear Scott, Dearest Zelda). The one I bought today — Zelda by Nancy Mildorf— was veeery cheap, in English and with hard cover. And I found the play Picnic (yeah, the one that inspired the movie) like for half a dollar.
I kept looking for the game and I saw it in a showcase. It was the last available!
Arrived home to lunch, checked my Reading List on Blogger, and saw a post called "And the winner is..." from Another Old Movie Blog. And guess what? I won the new restoration of Doctor Zhivago on DVD!! And that's very weird because I almost never win contests.
AND tomorrow is a national holiday :)
So, I'm gonna make another post for my Happy Old Songs series just to celebrate.


May 13, 2010

Rear Window's Guide to Properly Spying on your Neighbors


There are probably a lot of grammar mistakes, sorry for that. Anyway, it was fun to make :)

May 11, 2010

Book shopping morning

 Don't you just love going from book shop to book shop trying to find a treasure (or at least something interesting)? 
Well, I love to do that. In fact, when I have time I prefer don't get any help from the salesclerk, and just get myself lost in the old stores, searching for something special. And if I found it that way, that means I have to buy it.
Today I went to our capital (I have to travel 1 hour to get there) to re-validate my student card used for transportation, and I decided to go to San Diego street, which is full of bookshops. 
I visited one that had some discounts. I found an old "Rin Tin Tin" book, but I preferred not to buy it. Like half an hour later, I went to the next shop, they had the same discounts, but the used books were all uninteresting. When I was leaving, I read something like "Harrison Ford" in a book from a shelf that was near the floor. I squatted and started reading the titles. Shirley Maclaine, My Lucky Stars (I have that one), one about James Dean, another about Rodolfo Valentino (I just found out that he had a Chilean lover, Blanca Errázuriz), Katharine Hepburn...and one about Grace by James Spada. I had heard of that one, so I decided to buy it. It wasn't veeeeery cheap, but it was in good conditions.
Then, I entered to an old vinyl store. It was great. I saw the soundtracks of "My fair lady", "Les parapluies de Cherbourg", "West Side Story" and...(damn, I so have Doris' memory right now). Well, of course I didn't buy anything there, because first, I don't have a turntable, and second, I didn't have enough money.
It was kind of late, and I had to be back at home for lunch, so I decided to enter to the last used books store. And this time I asked to the salesclerk 'do you have something about classic stars or cinema?'. And he said yeah. He started looking for them in his small store, and passed me the bio of Marlon, Marylin, Greta (the only problem with this one is that it was in German), Samuel Goldwyn, and one called La gente hablará (People will talk by John Kobal) which included interviews with Gloria Swanson, Ingrid Bergman, Howard Hawks, Mae West and some more. I noticed I didn't have much money left (LOL) so I just decided to buy the later. The man noticed my money issues, and gave me the book for half of price. I promised I'd go back to buy the one about Goldywn. He said he will save it for me. 
Oh, one more thing. Near the exit of the subway station they had installed a huge and beautiful carousel; it was so lovely and unexpected I wished I had my sketchbook and watercolor set with me.

May 10, 2010

"Design for living" (1933) or love squares are complicated


Design for living (Ernst Lubitsch, 1933)
Who's in it: Gary Cooper + Fredrich March + Miriam Hopkins + Edward Everett Horton
What's about: a "love square" between a cartoonist girl, a writer, a painter, and a publicity company owner.
The good: I liked the first (interesting) and the last (funny) parts; the male leads are all great in their roles; the ending is great (I remembered "Bandits" with Cate Blanchett and Bruce Willis).
The bad:  I found everything in the middle kind of boring; it was somehow predictable and I think that Miriam Hopkins didn't show any profound emotion for any of the men during the movie, all her feelings were just in her lines not in her reactions, and this changes only just at the end. 
Should I see it?  Being a Lubitsch film I thought it would be better, I just laughed like 4 times during the movie, but the beginning and the end are worth watching.

Happy old songs

Which old songs cheer you up?
Today I was listening to my mp3, and I thought to make a series of post just with music charged with positive energy...here are the first three:

"Goody Goody" cover by Julie London.
Julie is one of my favorites singers, her voice is so cool and her singing style transmits freedom: it's like 'hey, whatever, life is nice, just relax'. And listen to the beginning of this version, isn't it great how she tries once and then she just starts with the song?

I noticed that the song wasn't in Youtube, so I just had to upload it :)

"Let's Misbehave" cover by Trevor Ashley.
 Every time I listen to this song I forget everything else, its rhythm is so captivating and the lyrics so liberating (There's something wild about you child, that's so contagious, let's be outrageous, let's misbehave!!!). And if you add to this song clips from screwball comedies, you have a happiness bomb:


"The Charleston", original melody by James P. Johnson (1923)
Isn't it swell?  : ) I was dying on the exercycle, but then this song came and my legs started to go faster :)
Well, and you have Ginger dancing to it, what else do you want? I know, my next happy old songs post ^^


 More Happy Old Songs :


Happy Old Songs are back! 
Happy Old Songs from Nora Ephron films
More Happy Old Songs
And even more Happy Old Songs

May 8, 2010

"Cover girl" (1944) or why musicals should be more than dance sequences


Cover Girl (Charles Vidor, 1944)
Who's in it: Rita Hayworth + Gene Kelly
What it's about: A dancer (Rita) must choose between staying with her boyfriend/boss (Gene) or being a famous dancer in Brodway and marrying a millionaire...
The good: There are some great musical numbers (my favorites were Gene dancing with his reflection on the street and "Put me to the test"); Rita is really good in this one, has some great scenes (like the interview for being a cover girl and her drunk scene); Eve Arden (she played Mildred's friend in "Mildred Pierce") is hilarious at some points. 
The bad: the story wasn't very attractive; Phil Silvers's character (Genius) was really unnecessary and boring and he was like in every scene; the whole story about Rita's grandma seemed to be there just to pad out the movie; it felt kind of long; I didn't get why Gene didn't allow Rita to be a cover girl (I mean he wasn't exactly training the girls for the National Ballet Competition). 
Should I see it? Hard to say, I wouldn't see it again complete, but I loved some scenes.

Errol & Olivia: Magic moments



Errol Flynn & Olivia de Havilland
Via: http://www.errol-flynn.com/
Song: "Magic moments" by Perry Como.



May 7, 2010

"Merrily we go to hell" (1932) or what happens if you marry a jerk


Merrily we go to hell (Dorothy Arzner, 1932)
Who's in it: Fredric March + Sylvia Sidney + George Irving (+ Cary Grant) 
What it's about: A heiress (Sidney) marries an alcoholic jerk (March)...
The good: this film —in charge of the only woman director during the "Golden Age"...how cool is that?— was very good overall; Sidney was a great actress and she carries the movie very well, showing the opposed feelings of her character: on one hand she really loves the guy and she tries to help him, but on the other that love is humiliating her and making her suffer; March is great as the alcoholic husband (just like in "A star is born") and he's so handsome (I never said these are serious reviews, lol); George Irving is very good as the worried father of the bride :) 
The movie has some shocking scenes, that look very modern (Sylvia's character watching her husband kissing another woman surrounded by drunk idiots). The ending is very emotive.
The bad: if you haven't noticed, I hated March's character, so it was a bit painful to see how forgiving was Sylvia with him again and again; Cary Grant appears too little as the heiress' party partner.
Should I see it? Yes. 

"Two faced woman" (1941) or how cool was Greta


Two faced woman (George Cukor, 1941)
Who's in it: Greta Garbo + Melvyn Douglas + Constance Bennett
What's it about: An important magazine editor (Douglas) marries a free-spirited ski instructor (Garbo), but she's afraid to lose him so she creates a twin sister to bring him back...will that help?
The good: I liked this movie very much, even when I've read some negative comments about Garbo's last movie; she and Douglas had a marvelous chemistry on screen and simply because of that it's worth watching; Garbo is really funny in this movie, my gosh, loved the dance scene and this quote:

Dancer: [about the dance Garbo just invented] What is it?
Garbo: Well, it's a sort of combination. 
Dancer: Of what? The rumba and the conga?
Garbo: (thinking) No... it's the Chiqui and the Choca.
Dancer: What do they call it?
Garbo: Uuh, la Chiqui Choca.

LOL!! 
The bad: At the beginning Douglas' character changed his mind like every two seconds and that was kind of unbelievable and tiring; his relationship with Bennet's character wasn't very clear; the end could be better. 
Should I see it?: It isn't as good as "Ninotchka" and maybe the plot isn't very memorable, but it's a light and funny comedy worth watching .

"The egg and I" (1947) or think twice before getting a farm


The egg and I (Chester Erskine, 1947)
Who's in it: Claudette Colbert + Fred MacMurray
What is it about: Newlyweds Betty (Colbert) and Bob(MacMurray) buy an old farm and try to start their own production of eggs.
The good: the story was very entertaining; the leads are great in their roles; Claudette is so funny, there are some hilarious moments (and some very emotional too...even some scary ones); the whole movie flows and leave you with a light spirit :)
The bad: I found MacMurray's character kind of annoying, he really pissed me off at some points.
Should I see it? Yes, pure fun.

May 4, 2010

Audrey


She would be 81 today. "So young?", said my brother. I know what he meant.
The ubiquitous icon, the wonderful actress, the shiny presence, the kindest woman, left us too early.
I've said that Hitch introduced me to classic movies. That's correct. But it was Audrey who showed me that the performers that happened to breath, dream, love and radiate splendor before I was born were worthy to watch. No, more than that: they deserved to be watched.
And there she was. She was Holly Golightly. She was there all dressed up eating her croissant in front of Tiffany's. She was there looking for her shoe and asking "how do I look?". She was there smiling, dancing, hiding her feelings. She was there suffering. She was there, sitting by the window, singing one of the most beautiful songs ever composed, ever written, with her own voice and her absent gaze. She was there drunk. She was there crying, in love, but not sure of anything. And it rained.
And then came "Sabrina", Billy Wilder, William Holden, Bogie, Paris, "Roman Holiday", Gregory Peck, William Wyler, Dalton Trumbo, Rome, "Love in the afternoon", Gary Cooper, Fascination, "Funny face", Stanley Donen, Fred Astaire, Givenchy, the Gershwin brothers, "War and peace", Henry Fonda, Mel Ferrer, "The Nun's story", Fred Zinemmann, "The Unforgiven", Burt Lancaster, "My Fair Lady", George Cukor, Rex Harrison, "Charade", Cary Grant, "Two for the road", Albert Finney...Audrey presented me so many talented people, such beautiful music and places, so many unforgettable movies. 
She educated me and made me a classic film lover.
She lived, she smiled, she looked around with her big eyes. No one, ever, ever, said something negative about her. She was kind and easy to work with. She remembered the terrible war, she remembered poor little Anna Frank. She loved chocolates and cigarettes. She was generous and respected the private life of others and her own. She wanted to love; she was deceived. She loved flowers. She traveled and tried to give some comfort to the innocent, the weak; she was ill. She died. She left us too early. 

But she's remembered. 

Annas and the Kings (part 2)

So, after all my investigation about Anna Leonowens, which is my favorite movie about her life in Siam? Let's see:


Anna and the King of Siam (John Cromwell, 1946)
Who's in it: Irene Dunne + Rex Harrison + Linda Darnell
The good: Irene Dunne's performance is great, she really looked like I imagine Anna; she was witty, secure and confident, but she also was capable of showing vulnerability and despair at some points (for example when the authorities give her a horrible house). I must say this: Irene cried so well on screen, you can see her eyes full of tears, out of anger or deep sorrow. 


The good about Rex Harrison is that he captured the “peculiar” manners described by Anna, the way he talks, the way he walks from one side to other (but sometimes he's kind of affected).  
The treatment of the relation between Anna ad the King is, I think, the most realistic of the three movies. They argue sometimes, they talk interested in what the other is saying and they respect each other. The closer they get is when she's writing a letter besides him on the floor. They look comfortable but not in love :)
Another thing is that the movie included almost every situation described by Anna in her diaries, and the most of them were very accurate to her writings (for example, she doesn't meet the King the first day she arrives to Siam). It's dramatic, but has some comic relief parts. The settings were good, and they added some interesting details (like Tuptim's monkey). The music was composed by Bernard Herman, and it helps to bring a sense of tension in some scenes.
The bad: the cast didn't include actors with Asiatic features, and that's a big con. I mean, no matter what Rex Harrison or Linda Darnell did in the movie, they just didn't look Asiatic. [spoiler]Another thing is that they invented situations, for example the death of Louis. I mean, why? Just to add drama to the movie?[/spoiler] Also Anna was kind of rude with Tuptim the first time she met her, and that wasn't necessary or true (besides it made look Anna somewhat bitter)
Should I see it? Yes, it's good overall.



The King and I (Walter Lang, 1956)
Who's in it: Deborah Kerr + Yul Brynner
The good: being a musical, I know we can't ask to this one to be tremendously dramatic or accurate. Deborah Kerr is entertaining and charming, her Anna is independent and kind; Yul Brynner looks like the King; the cast included actors with Asiatic features; the songs by Rodgers & Hammerstein are beautiful, especially "Getting to know you" and "Shall we dance"; everything is colorful and happy and the kiddies are adorable. The musical number based on "Uncle's Tom Cabin" at the banquet is awesome. 
The bad: even when it's a musical, Yul Brynner's King isn't a very good caricature, he was like a child learning everything from Anna (even how to use a napkin), and didn't seem prepared or studious, he was more interested in showing his abs —like the wolf guy in "New Moon"— and repeating "etcetera, etcetera, etcetera" than anything else; some things are truly unbelievable (f. ex. Tuptim creating a musical number based on "Uncle's Tom Cabin" in three days); the way they hint that prince Chulalonkorn changed the laws of his country because of Anna's teachings is ridiculous (his speech at the end, my gosh, was bad); and the last part is awfully developed (in one scene the King is dancing vigorously and in the next he's dying...because "his heart is sad" since Anna's leaving). Oh, and the Louis from this one was really annoying. 
Should I see it? Well, yes, because of the music.


Anna and the King (1999, Andy Tennant) 
Who's in it: Jodie Foster + Yun-Fat Chow
The good: I like Jodie Foster's performance, her Anna was still very sad for hes husband death, her dramatic scenes are very powerful, but she also can make you smile with some of her lines; Yun-Fat Chow is the best of the three Kings, he looks wise and eager to learn, and embodies very good the positive and dark sides described by Ms. Leonowens in her diaries: he can be kind but also menacing. The settings are the best of the three, showing the splendor of the palace and the noisy and crowded streets of Siam. The cast was very well chosen, especially the kids. It showed the dramatic parts in a very realistic way (Tuptim's trial and execution, for example). 
The bad: Anna was the center of the world in this movie, everything depends on her; she even helps to strategically win a battle and saves the King's life; in this movie Anna and the King explicitly profess a mutual love, so they took the easy way to capture the audience's attention; they added a whole story about a traitor Prince that wants to take the power, so they could show more action scenes.   
Should I see it?: Overall I liked it.  

As you can see, every movie has some positives and negatives sides. In my opinion there isn't still an ultimate movie about Anna Leonowens. If we could mix Dunne or Foster's performance, with the realistic settings of the last one and its King, and the most of the script of the first, that should be the best of all :)

May 3, 2010

Annas and the Kings (part 1)

I thought that comparing the three movies based on teacher Anna Leonowens' life would be very simple…but no, but no. I started a little investigation about Anna like 3 weeks ago, but I ended reading her diaries and trying to know more about her life. It was all so interesting.  And how could I say anything about the movies, without knowing what was created in Hollywood and what came from Anna's own diaries? And what could I say about the portraits that six actors made of Anna and the King without knowing the real ones?
So I’m gonna make a first post about the real Anna and her diaries —linking some situations with the movies—, and a second with the movies mini-reviews.


The Annas: the real, and the ones played by Irene Dunne(1946) , Deborah Kerr (1956) & Jodie Foster (1999)

I must start saying that Anna’s life, teachings and her impact in the political and social changes (like the abolition of slavery) that were introduced in Siam (now Thailand) are still a controversial subject. She wrote two diaries about her life in Siam, but it seems that she liked to make the stories more interesting than they actually were and she even changed some details of her own life. And the story changed even more with the novel by Margaret Landon (in which were based the first two movies).

A beautiful melody from "The King and I".

So, if you have seen any of the films, you probably have some doubts. Were the King and Anna in love? Were the slaves situations real? In which context the King died? What really happened with her son Louis? etcetera, etcetera, etcetera (as Yul Brynner loved to say). Well, here are some facts about this famous English teacher:

· Her name was Anna Harriette Crawford Leonowens. 
· Her first child, Thomas, died when he was only one year. 
· Then she had a girl, Avis, and a boy, Louis (when she went to Siam with Louis, Avis was studying in England). 
· Her husband, Thomas Leonowens died of apoplexy in 1859, at the age of 31.
· She lived in Siam between March-1862 & July-1867.
· This means that when she met King Mongkut, he was 57 years old and she was 30.
· This also means that Ana wasn't in Siam when King Mongkut died.
· She taught English to 39 wives and concubines of the King and their 82 children.
· She wrote two books: The English Governess at the Siamese Court and The Romance of the Harem (click on the titles to read the books).
· There was a novel based on these books, Anna and the King of Siam by Margaret Landon.
· Some of her stories about concubines being tortured seem to be based just in gossips to some experts.
· The three movies based on her life were banned in Thailand because historical inaccuracies.
· She did discuss “Uncle Tom’s cabin” by Harriet Stowe —which had an anti-slavery message— with prince Chulalongkorn. 
· The King Mongkut died in 1868, when his successor, prince Chulalongkorn was 15 years old.
· Louis Leonowens died in 1919 during the global influenza pandemic.
· And most important: there wasn't any kind of romantic link between Anna and the King.

This list is very interesting, but I still don't know what scenes that were on the movies were incredible situations described by Anna herself, things that according to the English teacher really happened someday in Siam, a century and  half ago. So let's talk about Anna’s diaries and the things she included about her life in Siam, the King and his wives and children. 

Things included in “The English Governess…:




1. Many details from the movies are from this first book:
Anna describes all the splendor of the palace in great detail; she wrote several chapters about the everyday life of people at the palace and also about the History of Siam.The way she arrives with her boy to Siam, how the bare-chested Siamese people impressed them, how the people at the palace referred to her as “sir” (the reason for this is not explained in the book), the first time she met the King (wasn't her first day in Siam), how interested were the wives and concubines to know about her dress and her husband, how she fought for her rights and faced authorities several times, the white elephant adoration (it did exist), the day she was invited to presence a Buddhist service (this loosely appears in the second movie), the conversations she had with the King about religion and some political matters…all that is in the book.


The Kings: the real, and the ones played by Rex Harrison, Yul Brynner & Yun-Fat Chow. 
2. The King Mongkut  
Of course, she also describes the King.  

“In person he was of middle stature, slightly built, of regular features and fair complexion. In early life he lost most of his teeth, but he had had them replaced with a set made from apan-wood,—a secret that he kept very sensitively to the day of his death.”(246)

Along the book, Anna says that the King had some positive sides, but also some dark sides.  She says he loved his children, that he could be very kind with her and Louis, and “he was more systematically educated and more capacious devourer of books and news, than perhaps any man of equal rank in our day” (p. 97). She explains that he was very prepared and during his reign he accomplished many important things like several commercial treaties with other countries.
But she also describes some occasions in which the King threatened her, and she even said that once he was so violent that she thought her life was at risk (p. 273). She says that “as husband and kinsman his character assumes a most revolting aspect. Envious, revengeful, subtle, he was as fickle and petulant as he was suspicious and cruel.” (p. 244)
She also talks about the problem with her petition of a house outside the palace, how the authority first gave her a horrible cabin just to make her desist and how all this affected her emotionally (we will see which of the actresses captured better her vulnerability):

“You shall live in palace”, he roared—‘you shall live in palace! (…) My boy began to cry; tears filled my own eyes…” (p. 65)

From her descriptions, you can notice some of the characteristic gestures of the King that appear in the movies, like the way he asks questions very rapidly.







"Ranged on the carpet were many prostrate, mute, and motionless forms, over whose heads to step was a temptation as drolly natural as it was dangerous. His Majesty spied us quickly, and advanced abruptly, petulantly screaming, "Who? who? who?"  (p. 57)

  



3. Anna's wittiness and her funny side; the kind of conversations she maintained with the King:


Anna and her age: "I demurely replied ‘One hundred and fifty years old'"
 
The next dialog —that to me seemed to be invented in Hollywood—was in the book too:

“Suddenly his Majesty, having cogitated sufficiently in his peculiar manner, with one long final stride halted in front of us, and, pointing straight at me with my sex's distaste for so serious question, asked: ‘How old shall you be?’
Scarcely able to repress a smile for so serious question, I demurely replied ‘One hundred and fifty years old'.
Had I made myself much younger, he might have ridiculed or assailed me; but now he stood surprised and embarrassed for a few moments, then resumed his queer march; and at last, beginning to perceive the jest, coughed, laughed, coughed again, and in high, sharp key asked, ‘In what year were you born?’
Instantly I struck a mental balance, and answered, as gravely as I could “In 1788”.
 At this point the expression of his Majesty's face was indescribably comical. Captain B slipped behind a pillar to laugh; but the king only coughed, with a significant emphasis that startled me, and addressed a few words to his prostrate courtiers, who smiled at the carpet,—all except the prime minister, who turned to look at me. But his Majesty was not to be baffled so: again he marched with vigor, and then returned to the attack with Elan.
     “How many years shall you be married?”
     “For several years, your Majesty.”
      He fell into a brown study; then suddenly rushed at me, and demanded triumphantly—
     “Ha! How many grandchildren shall you now have? Ha! ha! How many? How many? Ha! ha! ha!”
 Of course we all laughed with him; but the general hilarity admitted of a variety of constructions.” (p. 57-58)

After this the King actually took her hand and dragged her (with Louis holding her skirt) and presented his wives and children, just like the first two movies show. 


A very emotive scene described by Anna in her diaries.
 
4. The children and the death of a little princess.
She's was very fond of the royal children, especially prince Chulalonkorn and princess Fâ-ying. She says:  

“to this young prince, Chowfa Chulalonkorn, I was strongly attached. He often deplored with me the cruelty with which the slaves were treated, and, young as he was, did much to inculcate kindness toward them among his immediate attendants. He was a conscientious lad, of pensive habit and gentle temper…” (p. 284)

And in a very emotive chapter dedicated to the death of the little princess, Anna describes her as “sweet and bright” and eager to learn. She explains that cholera attacked the palace and that the King called for her. We can see how much King trusted in Anna by a letter she transcribes: 

"My dear Mam, — Our well-beloved daughter, your favorite pupil, is attacked with cholera, and has earnest desire to see you, and is heard much to make frequent repetition of your name. I beg that you will favor her wish. I fear her illness is mortal, as there has been three deaths since morning. She is best beloved of my
children.
" I am your afflicted friend,
" S. S. P. P. Maha Mongkut."

Her death —that was included in the first and in the last movie—is described in such heartbreaking way:

“An attendant hurried me to the king, who, reading the heavy tidings in my silence, covered his face with his hands and wept passionately. Strange and terrible were the tears of such a man, welling up from a heart from which all natural affections had seemed to be expelled, to make room for his own exacting, engrossing conceit of self.
Bitterly he bewailed his darling, calling her by such tender, touching epithets as the lips of loving Christian mothers use. What could I say? What could I do but weep with him, and then steal quietly away and leave the king to the Father?” (p. 119)


5. Why and how she left Siam.
At the end (like 4 chapters after Fâ-ying dies), Anna decided to leave Siam because she was ill, and she thought she “was no longer able to comply with the pitiless exactions of the king.” (p. 282). The last goodbye is very emotional (and I really don't understand why none of the movies used this as the end), as she wrote:

“The king himself, who had been silent and sullen until the morning of my departure, relented when the time came to say good bye. He embraced Boy with cordial kindness, and gave him a silver buckle, and a bag containing a hundred dollars to buy sweetmeats on the way. Then turning to me, he said (as if forgetting himself):
" Mam! You much beloved by our common people, and all inhabitants of palace and royal children. Everyone is in affliction of your departure; and even that opium-eating secretary, P'hra-Alack, is very low down in his heart because you will go. It shall be because you must be a good and true lady. I am often angry on you, and lose my temper, though I have large respect for you. But nevertheless you ought to know you are difficult woman, and more difficult than generality. But you will forget, and come back to my service, for I have more confidence on you every day. Good bye! ‘ I could not reply; my eyes filled with tears.” (p. 283)


Anna wasn't in Siam when the King died.
6. The King's death.
Like I said, the King died a year after Anna left Siam (some people is so gonna link these facts). So in one of the chapters (which is not the last in the book) she describes in past tense what happened the day the King died. Is it said the he called to his side his nearest relatives. After saying goodbye to them, he spoke with some authorities and then “solemnly imposed upon them the care of his eldest son, the Chowfa Chulalonkorn, and of his kingdom” (p. 230).

“Then turning his gaze upon a small image of his adored teacher [Buddha, not Anna ppl!], he seemed for some time absorbed in awful contemplation. ‘Such is life'. Those were actually the last words of this most remarkable Buddhist king.”

Only the last movie doesn't show Anna besides the King death bed. 
In the second book, “Romance of the harem” there are two relevant parts for the movies.


(Isn't this horrible? Actress Linda Darnell really died in a fire.)
7. The death of concubine Tuptim
She describes her as “very beautiful by nature”, but adds that she looked unhappy. In the palace Tuptim wasn’t very popular among the women because the King defended her and she was kind of disobedient. Anna says that they met several times, but she looked like a girl, so she didn’t know what to talk about. Tuptim asked Anna to teach her how to write a name, Khoon Phra Balat, in English. One day, Tuptim gave her a piece of paper with the same name written. A year after that she disappeared from palace and went to a monastery. After she was found, she was arrested. Anna tried to help Tuptim, and assisted to the trial. She describe how Tuptim looked this way:
 
“Her hair was cut close to her head, and her eyebrows had been shaved off. Her cheeks were hollow and sunken. Her eyes were cast down. Her hands were manacled, and her bare little feet could hardly drag along the heavy chains that were fastened to her ankles. Her scarf was tied tightly over her bosom, and under it her close-fitting vest was buttoned up to the throat. Her whole form was still childlike, but she held herself erect, and her manner was self-possessed. When she spoke, her voice was clear and vibrating, her accent firm and unflinching. (p. 26)
 
Tuptim tried to defend Balat, explaining how she got to the monastery, and how he didn't recognize her. But the judges didn't believe her version. Balat was brought, beaten and tortured and Tuptim was condemned to receive 30 blows. After watching the first, Anna reacted this way:
 
“When the first blow descended on the girl's bare and delicate shoulders, I felt as if bound and lacerated myself, and losing all control over my actions, forgetting that I was a stranger and a foreigner there, and as powerless as the weakest of the oppressed around me, I sprang forward, and heard my voice commanding the executioners to desist, as they valued their lives. The Amazons at once dropped their uplifted bamboos, and 'Why so?' asked the judge. 'At least till I can plead for Tuptim before his Majesty,' I replied. 'So be it,' said the wretch; 'go your way; we will wait your return.'  (p. 32-33)
 

Anna says that when she begged to the King for Tumptim’s life he laughed in her face –which she found “revolting”—and then he said that her petition was granted and Tuptim would go to work in a rice-mill. But after this conversation, a judge talked with the King and gave him details of the trial, and the King —angry— changed his mind. 
Tuptim and Balat were condemned to be exposed and tortured for the improvement of the public morals. Anna wrote:  
 
“To do justice to the king, I must here add that, having been educated a priest, he had been taught to regard the crime of which Tuptim and Balat were accused as the most deadly sin that could be committed by man” (p. 36)
 
Anna describes all the torture process, and how much dignity Tuptim displayed. Tuptim is tortured, but she maintained her version. Seeing Tuptim suffer was too much for Anna, so she fainted . When she recovered, she was told that Tuptim and the priest were condemned to death by fire. And that's what finally happened (just the first movie showed this).
After that, Tuptim’s version was proven right (!!!!). Anna saw the King a month after, and he said:
 
“I have much sorrow, mam, much sorrow, and respect for your judgment; but our laws are severe for such the crime. But now I shall cause monument to be erected to the memory of Balat and Tuptim." (p.41)

8. The slave.
In another chapter, Anna tells the story of a slave woman with a baby that was chained in the palace garden, and by her intervention, she's freed.



No wonder why Hollywood loves the story of Anna Leonowens. As you can see, many things that we see in the movies are from Anna's very own books, and the were described in very vivid words and much detail. What I couldn't find in her diaries was the banquet with foreign authorities, the King's adoration for the word "etcetera", the whole thing that appeared in the third movie about a traitor Prince and Anna helping the King to defeat the enemy, and of course, her love for the King.  


In the next post, my mini reviews for the three movies. 
  


{ Things got hotter and hotter with every movie Hollywood released. 

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...